GH  O  TI

                                                                                           f        i      sh

 

 

Amy Hempel’s The Dog of the Marriage

 

The Dog of the Marriage, Amy Hempel.  New York: Scribner, 2005. Hardcover, $20.00 ISBN 0-7432-6451-7

 

I finished Amy Hempel’s latest short story collection, “The Dog of the Marriage,”after a visit to the Georgia O’Keefe museum in Santa Fe. During this particular visit the museum hosted an exhibit, “Moments in Modernism: Georgia O’Keefe and Andy Warhol, Flowers of Distinction” and on the wall for this exhibit were quotes by both authors. One by O’Keefe made me think immediately of Hempel’s work and certainly of “The Dog of the Marriage.”

 

“Nobody sees a flower, really, it is so small. It takes time—we haven’t time—and to see takes time, like having a friend takes time”.—O’Keefe

 

Like O’Keefe, Hempel is a microscopic visionary highlighting what others don’t take the time to see. Not content to paint pretty reality to scale, they both expose the insides, everything that would remain hidden at first glance, pistil, stamen, fleshy petals, longing, instability, desperation, vulnerability, stasis, recovery.

 

Hempel’s work is often defined in vogue terminology: minimalist, fragmentary, wit, passion, reserve. Her characters are described as people in crisis or people post crisis. And while all of the above is true, this does little to illustrate the effect of the above elements together, how she surgically implements equal parts passion and restraint, wit and self reflection, in a way that pulls from the text an emotional resonance evident in the narrator and in the reader.

 

Hempel’s narrative voice in “The Dog of the Marriage” is at once detached and achingly intimate. In the title story, Hempel writes a narrator experiencing the loss of a relationship and marriage. The narrator’s husband is in love with someone else and here she is caught in a moment of reflection.

 

“Did I invite this? Is it like sitting in prayers at school when the headmistress says, “Who dropped the lunch bags on the hockey field?” and although you went home for lunch, you think, I did, I did.”

 

Hempel turns her microscopic lens on humanity with stripped to the bone sentences that lend power to her work.  In a story reminiscent of Virginia Woolf’s “Three Guineas,” Hempel’s “Reference # 388475848-5” is the narrators written response to a parking citation for “covering ‘The Empire State’ ” on her license plate. The narrative tale twists through events leading to the ticket. Hempel’s wit and economy are in full force.  The narrator’s response to the ticket is a plea for justice.

 

“You accuse me of trying to put a human face on this. And you would be correct.  But is there anything wrong with that? Unless the ticket was issued by the guy my dog startled, I know it isn’t personal.  But I’m not a person who can take this ticket in stride with the kind of urbanity urbane people prize in each other.”

 

What is classic Hempel in this story is that the narrative moves through witty barbs to a scene in the park where the narrator has a frightening experience. The two experiences of the ticket and the park are then linked in the narrative and though she returns to wit, the incident in the park haunts the remaining narrative like a ghost.

 

In her final story, “Offertory,” a narrator is coaxed by her lover to divulge details of a past romantic encounter with a couple, the result is a sexual Scheherazade.

 

“In bed where I describe the coupling years ago, he would suddenly roll me over so that I was on top.  He would tell me to lean over and show him how my hair had made a tent over the face of the husband or the wife.”

 

Throughout “Offertory,” in addition to the narrator’s storytelling, there are moments of delicate and telling reflection.

 

“It is possible to imagine a person so entirely that the image resists attempts to dislodge it.”

 

Dogs that appear throughout the narrative are harbingers of what’s missing for the narrators: stability, loyalty and love. They are created as characters, not simply symbols of what’s missing. The narrators also experience what they lack in their human connections in their relationships to canine companions.

 

Works by both Hempel and O’Keefe invite us to pause, take an extra beat, then two, then three as we witness the everyday, a flower or a failed marriage, from the inside out. They entreat us to do more than stop and smell the roses. We are to enjoy every subtle color change, each dip and fold, the way they look when they fade and fall. Amy Hempel paints a rich tapestry of passion, longing, and obsession, lost and found with a style as telling as a fingerprint and with stories filled with characters up to their necks in life.

 

-Donna Epler

 

 

Current Issue

Contributors

Archives